Growing up during the divisive Vietnam War era, political discussions at the dinner table were the norm. True to their North Carolina farm roots, both my parents were socially conservative, but their views on politically charged topics varied greatly.

Prior to Ronald Reagan’s two terms in office, much of the American South was solidly Democratic. Politicians such as North Carolina’s ‘country lawyer,’ Senator Sam Ervin, who served from 1954 to 1974 and famously chaired the US Senate Committee that impeached Richard Nixon, supported policies with benefits that reached far beyond their provincial constituencies. Years later, another North Carolina senator, Republican Jesse Helms, made an art of conducting mud-slinging campaigns and using the senate filibuster to promote his own personal agenda.

Even given that background, neither of my parents would recognize today’s American political landscape. Despite my mother’s Democratic leanings and my father’s closet Republican mind-set, they both valued the shared truth that our nation’s government was designed to work for ALL the people, and not just any select few.

They believed that just as successful personal relationships involved inevitable struggles and a great deal of compromise, so did a properly functioning government.Their values of honesty, integrity and respect for human dignity seem completely out of fashion now, having been replaced by verbalized hatred and the belief that unethical and immoral behavior is to be tolerated as long as someone’s narrow agenda is being fulfilled.

While I certainly don’t idealize the flaws of past eras, specifically the racial segregation and prejudice that was codified in law and still exists in many forms today, there was a time when Republicans and Democrats were more intent on successfully passing compromise bills than on shutting down the system for personal political gain. It seems the Republican party has become particularly afflicted by the latter since Newt Gingrich and the 1994 Republican Revolution swept through Congress.

Gingrich and his colleagues set the stage for the Tea Party of Ted Cruise and the eventual enthronement of Donald Trump as head of the party’s chaos-creation unit. The hysterical performances of some Republicans during the Trump impeachment hearings have shown just how frightening primary elections are to Republican incumbents threatened by this new breed of maverick warfare.

While the Democratic Party has gone through it’s own changes, it hasn’t been subject to the same level of fragmentation, or should I say implosion. However, the 2020 election cycle is just revving up and there are already Democratic candidates complaining about the kind of hard-line purity tests that many Republicans have been subjected to over the past two decades.

Money, Party Loyalty and Radical Individualism

Let me be clear here. I personally feel no loyalty to either of America’s polarized political parties. The Republican National Committee (RNC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the entities that fund-raise and steer each party’s agenda are nothing more than major corporations, beholden to large donors in much the same way other corporations are influenced by their largest shareholders. However, my lack of party loyalty hasn’t blinded me to the fact that I share far more affinity with Democratic policies than with the GOP.

Even though I pride myself on being an individual, I also recognize that rampant individualism has been instrumental in creating the kind of hyper-partisanship we see today. When one individual can shut down the government for 16 days, as Texas Senator Ted Cruz did in 2013, purportedly costing the US $24 billion dollars, then radical individualism is taking it’s toll on the democratic system.  Party loyalty, the glue that seemed to hold the system together (as flawed as it may have been) has been exchanged for individual ego-stroking which is then disguised for the masses as moral principle.

If radical individualism is allowed to go unchallenged, Robert N. Bellah writes in the 1985 book Habits of the Heart, “what results is a society of atomized individuals who really can’t operate a democratic system and therefore will fall back on some kind of an administrative authoritarianism to keep things going.”

David Horsey, 2019, Seattle Times

The Grand Old Party is barely recognizable

While the idea that American politicians are controlled by special interests rather than serving the citizenry was around long before Donald Trump broke the election mold in 2016, his rise to power seems to have been enabled by the same anti-government venom espoused by Ted Cruz and other Tea Party members. Theirs is the ‘throw the baby out with the bathwater and then burn the house down’ line of reasoning. And then, even though we don’t have a plan or a new house to occupy, we’ll just wing it and see what happens. Based on the Congressional gridlock of the past decade, this scorched earth policy would appear to be a poor strategy for finding solutions in a country desperately in need of them.

During the 2016 election campaign, Trump constantly repeated two mantras to whip up his emotional political rallies: 1) “Build the Wall”–an anti-immigrant message that appealed to the racist fears of many white Americans, and 2) “Drain the Swamp”, a reference to corrupt politicians in Washington, D.C. who are beholden to the outside interests of big money–corporate lobbyists and the kind of anonymous vast-sum donors allowed to influence both elections and legislation since the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United vs FEC decision.

By succeeding in tapping into a vein of deep discontent within his targeted groups, Trump was able to out-maneuver the RNC and become the Republican nominee. In doing so, he also managed to control the ‘there is no truth’ narrative being fed to his followers. What is now obvious to those who can still see beyond the end of their own noses is that Donald Trump is quite possibly the most corrupt president America has ever produced.

Somewhat prophetically, one of Trump’s rivals, former Florida governor Jeb Bush, put it succinctly in a 2016 Republican debate. “Donald is great at the one-liners, but he is a chaos candidate and he would be a chaos president.” Chalk one up for Bush’s predictive skills.

While Americans and their elected representatives argue and Trump continues to grandstand and gaslight, China’s and Russia’s authoritarian leaders are working within systems that allow them to make lightening fast decisions without any of the limitations faced by a gridlocked American Congress.

One of Trump’s standard lines that he has continually repeated since 2016 is “you’re gong to get so tired of wining.” Well, Mr. President, I’d say that China and Russia are surely the ones winning due to the chaos you’ve encouraged in Washington, D.C. from your very first day in office. Simply put, chaos is NOT a formula for winning!

Final Words

Even though Trump is merely a symptom of the greater problem of the partisan divide within the US political system, at every turn he has seized on the opportunity to manipulate and fan the flames of division. These fires are deliberately set in order to distract US citizens while important checks and balances on executive power are being dismantled behind the scenes.

While Trump and his Republican counterparts create chaos, problems such as man-made climate change and inequality continue to grow and Americans continue to be slaughtered in mass shootings. Chaos is a prescription for failure and decline, not for problem solving and strengthening our democracy and citizens’ well-being.

peace~henry

Header Image: Agence France Presse

Posted by Henry Lewis

Unconventional artist, writer, videographer and teacher. Personal Quote: It isn't easy being me ;-)

27 Comments

  1. Reblogged this on The Secular Jurist and commented:
    Another brilliant editorial by our friend Henry which I’m recommending as MUST READ. Here’s an excerpt that aligns with my recent post on intellectual devolution and the breakdown of civil society:

    “If radical individualism is allowed to go unchallenged, Robert N. Bellah writes in the 1985 book Habits of the Heart, ‘what results is a society of atomized individuals who really can’t operate a democratic system and therefore will fall back on some kind of an administrative authoritarianism to keep things going.'”

    Liked by 4 people

    Reply

  2. I believe legislation was introduced to allow for government to continue until a new budget is passed. Don’t remember the details or if it was passed. We also need to repeal the law imposing a debt ceiling. Those changes would avoid shutdowns of the government.

    The constitution was written to make it difficult to pass laws on purpose. And aside from the budget and shutdown problem it is working. They did that to protect minority interests. Even one man minority interests. They did not want a slim majority to be able to do anything it wanted. Bit a slim minority should not be allowed to shut the government down.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

    1. HI OG,

      Thanks for stopping by and sharing your insights!

      Like

      Reply

  3. Very good article..

    Liked by 5 people

    Reply

    1. Thanks for your support Jane!

      Like

      Reply

  4. Excellent….well written…

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  5. Excellent post

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  6. Great post.

    Democracy is cumbersome. Especially when compared to a dictatorship.

    Corporations, for the most part, are operated more like dictatorships than democracies and this difference is one of the weapons used by business executives – by pointing out the greater efficiency of a dictatorship, or to a lesser degree an oligarchy – when going to battle in the political arena. When people use feelings instead of thoughts and base important decisions on fear, greed and frustration instead of compassion, justice and integrity they blindly give up freedom of thought for convenience. Just look at how we cherish technological breakthroughs and cool gadgets today much more so than making sure our fellow citizens have the basic necessities in life. The rulers convinced many of us long ago that wants are needs.

    The “radical individualism” you mentioned feeds selfishness, which accentuates greed. We used to admire people who worked toward the betterment of all as opposed to working merely for personal gain. Now, personal gain is admired as success while sacrificing for the greater good is viewed as foolishly childish.

    In the world of politics you mentioned the blind party loyalty which has helped fragment society. I remember how the staunchly conservative republican, Barry Goldwater, grilled the staunchly conservative republican Reagan administration people about the Iran-Contra scandal. He was more concerned about the checks and balances of our governmental system than about party loyalty. My views differed greatly from Sen. Goldwater’s, but I admired his behavior during those Senate hearings. Today we have people committing crimes and blatantly lying just to coverup despicable crimes – even treason – by members of the government due to party loyalty.

    You’ve put your finger on a very important problem that needs immediate attention. I hope more people see these disturbing trends and decide to place compassion and courage ahead of selfish desires.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. Thanks so much for making your key points and sharing your insights. It’s much appreciated! I agree that democracy is cumbersome and messy at times.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

  7. Well said, Henry! It’s concerning that he can’t see that China and Russia are the ones who are winning. Xi Jinping and Putin are, no doubt, doing what they can behind the scenes to have him re-elected in 2020.

    Liked by 4 people

    Reply

    1. Hi Rosaliene,

      Yes, I agree. I’m sure DT is counting on their support, especially from his best buddy Putin.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

    1. Thank you Jim, but please don’t call me sir 🙂

      Like

      Reply

  8. Wow Henry! Very apt analysis of the current trends in ways of thinking and behaving that show dangerous disregard for long respected values, such as the ones you name, of honesty, integrity, dignity. Where could this lead? All the points expressed with power and clarity. Well done!

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. Very well expressed!I’m Canadian but spend 6 months of the year in Washington state. I have good friends on both sides of the fence. I find the whole political climate in the USA quite disturbing.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. It’s disturbing for sure. Thanks Karen.

        Like

    2. Hi Marios,

      I find what’s playing out in the USA right now to be shocking, despite Trump’s proclivities being well known to all due his previous celebrity status. He is a text book example of a demagogue, appealing to the prejudices and selfish desires of his core supporters, yet working for the sole benefit of his own personal power. Thanks for sharing your thoughts Marios.

      Like

      Reply

      1. You’re welcome. Also, he has said a few times that I am the president, and I can do what I want. I guess he thinks he can walk on water.

        Like

  9. As a Canadian armchair American, I am horrified by trump.
    I see America, as Rome in its last days. I sure hope I am wrong.

    Come senators, Congressmen
    Please heed the call
    Don’t stand in the doorway
    Don’t block up the hall
    For he that gets hurt
    Will be he who has stalled
    There’s a battle outside
    And it is ragin’.
    It’ll soon shake your windows
    And rattle your walls
    For the times they are a-changin’.

    ~ Bob Dylan

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. I agree Resa. In my humble opinion, Trump is hastening the demise of the USA as a political and economic power. It’s sad that 40+ % of the American public can’t see beyond the end of their own noses, or own prejudices in the case. Thanks for sharing Dylan’s lyrics with us.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Well, I can see past the end of my nose, but then I have a short cute one. LOL! (obviously kidding)
        The poets, artists of all ilk, have a lot to say. I wish more would speak out with their art!
        I have a homeless post ready to go. It’s because I took pics of street art in an underpass where at least 50 people are living this winter.
        Do I post now, and put a bummer on Chickmas? Or do I wait until the new year, when it will just be a regular bummer?

        Liked by 1 person

  10. Hi Resa,

    Living in Colombia, I’m out of touch with what’s happening in the US gallery scene, but there is definitely a lot of inspiration (both negative and positive) coming from American culture right now.

    You have to make your own decision, but I’d post when you think the most people will view which probably means after the holidays. There’s an epidemic of homelessness in many areas of the USA, and it’s such an important topic.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.